合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國(guó)保潔 |
美國(guó)強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 0.01mg是什么精度的天平？超微量天平的稱重范圍
> 測(cè)量表面張力/界面張力的儀器有哪些？怎么選
> 表面張力儀的測(cè)試范圍以及測(cè)值精度的意義
> 甜菜堿型兩性表面活性劑與有機(jī)膦酸鹽防垢復(fù)配，有效降低樁西原油體系油-水動(dòng)態(tài)界面張力
> 磁場(chǎng)強(qiáng)度和磁化時(shí)長(zhǎng)對(duì)除草劑溶液表面張力、噴霧霧滴粒徑的影響（一）
> 身體對(duì)稱性和表面張力有什么關(guān)系
> W/O型Pickering乳液油水間的界面張力對(duì)乳液穩(wěn)定性的影響
> 不同質(zhì)量濃度、pH、鹽度對(duì)三七根提取物水溶液表面張力的影響（三）
> 低表面界面張力驅(qū)、滲一體化驅(qū)油劑的合成路線
> 合成血液穿透試驗(yàn)：表面張力受溫度、表面活性劑影響較大
推薦新聞Info
-
> 單萜萜類驅(qū)油劑界面張力、配伍性、降黏效果及破乳效果測(cè)試與篩選（三）
> 單萜萜類驅(qū)油劑界面張力、配伍性、降黏效果及破乳效果測(cè)試與篩選（二）
> 單萜萜類驅(qū)油劑界面張力、配伍性、降黏效果及破乳效果測(cè)試與篩選（一）
> 紫檀芪的穩(wěn)定性增強(qiáng)型抗氧化劑制作備方及界面張力測(cè)試——結(jié)果與討論、結(jié)論
> 紫檀芪的穩(wěn)定性增強(qiáng)型抗氧化劑制作備方及界面張力測(cè)試—— 引言、材料與方法
> 香豆素取代二乙炔LB膜的組裝、聚合及螺旋結(jié)構(gòu)形成機(jī)制（下）
> 香豆素取代二乙炔LB膜的組裝、聚合及螺旋結(jié)構(gòu)形成機(jī)制（中）
> 香豆素取代二乙炔LB膜的組裝、聚合及螺旋結(jié)構(gòu)形成機(jī)制（上）
> 電鍍液表面張力、接觸角、流速以及壓強(qiáng)等因素對(duì)硅通孔浸潤(rùn)過(guò)程的影響（二）
> 電鍍液表面張力、接觸角、流速以及壓強(qiáng)等因素對(duì)硅通孔浸潤(rùn)過(guò)程的影響（一）
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來(lái)源：上海謂載 瀏覽 1819 次 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲(chóng)表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時(shí)間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時(shí)。 初始潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測(cè)試了土傳表面的影響 潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會(huì)加速潤(rùn)濕過(guò)程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動(dòng)不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號(hào) 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——概括、介紹
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——材料和方法